Wednesday, February 25, 2009

Things I like about the house

The observant will have noted, perhaps with faint regret, that I have not posted anything for some months. Now that the house is finished, this blog is beginning to show its redundancy, and banging on about how pretty the wood and the house are may seem boastful and rude. But there are a few concluding comments to make before deciding whether to keep this page alive for other purposes.

The house works very well. (Should I add “so far”? No.) It has few redundant spaces; pretty much all of it is useful, unlike, for example, the hall at Park Street, which as I have already bored some of you by pointing out, is a perfect example of the point Frank Lloyd Wright made about the immorality of certain sorts of house design: making a show for one’s public face whilst consigning the important parts of the house, such as the kitchen, to an actual or metaphorical basement. I am pleased to say that coming more or less straight into the kitchen is a very nice way to enter a house. The big landing is good, too, even though we have not furnished it yet, and so it is not really operating as it is intended to do. The only rooms we do not regularly use ourselves are the spare bedroom (for which guests may be grateful) and the study, the latter because it has no furniture yet. But when the weather gets warmer I mean to keep the study door and the spare bedroom door open, for the views.

The vistas are probably the best thing about the design. You can see all the way through each floor, into every room except the utility room, the study and the upstairs spare loo, when all the doors are open; and when the study door is open you get an immediate view through to the back (or front) of the house as you come in the front (or back) door.

You do hear quite a lot of what is going on in other parts; but when that is music from the sitting room that is rather a good thing (depending on the music). Also, as I type this at the table, I realise that it is convenient for someone quietly doing difficult sums to Mozart in the sitting room to be able to ask the person in the kitchen, without shouting, for a vital cup of coffee, please. Hang on whilst I deal with that.

One more thing about the layout: how like it is to some of the vicarages we have lived in - the study near the front door so that the parishioners can be ushered straight in to see the vicar, and the family's places further in.

Other things I like: the kitchen. Well, it is a stronger emotion than mere liking. The wood; the height of the bench tops; the storage drawers; the lighting; two sinks; the taps; an extractor fan (first time since Poffley End where we had an industrial strength one that blew both ways, because we thought the Aga would like it); the space. I would write an exclamation mark here, if I had not taken a vow against them. And having a separate utility room.

Continuing with the list of the things I like: the sitting room. This means its shelves, though there are not enough of them and the top shelf requires the reach of an ape and the legs of a giraffe; and its windows, though I am not sure if the ones for the piano are quite large enough. It is a good size, too, and our stuff looks nice in it.

More. (As Dornford Yates would say.) The bathroom, loos and shower: their oak shelves, the neat little taps, the monsoon force shower (a combination of water under pressure and a big shower head), the shower seat, cantilevered loos, elegant big tiles.

The oak floors upstairs and the tiled ones downstairs. Nice, plain, and (downstairs) WARM (unless Nibe is away for the time being).

No draughts. I really am tempted to write an exclamation mark here. Even without curtains, and when Nibe was sulking at New Year when the temperature never got above freezing and was mostly rather far below it, the house is not cold. Double glazing, Scandinavian windows and lots of insulation in the walls and roof do the trick.

I could go on, but I won’t. Do come and see for yourselves how it works.

What I did last weekend


1 Jan 2009

Arty pictures

9 comments:

Janet said...

One of the best things we have done in our house is the construction of the hatch between the kitchen and the dining room. This makes laying and clearing the table so much easier than if it were not there.
The only problem is that the dining room people can hear the kitchen people better than vice versa owing to radio, washing machine, tumble drier etc etc.which leads to one sided conversations.
Having our sitting room upstairs makes it much more of a withdrawing room, and we actually spend more time in the dining room reading papers etc.
Looking forward to reclaiming backroom leading onto the garden once all children have left home. May have to buy a second house to achieve this ambition.

Anonymous said...

I think the Horton solution would be to leave the offspring in the house and build a withdrawing development for J&S at the bottom of the garden. Or do the planners there frown upon such schemes ? The Oxford attitude seems to be - if there's enough room for a tree , build a house on it.

Cecilia said...

Tree house?

Cecilia said...

Don't get me started on the joy of putting things away in an open plan kitchen dining room with lots of bench top space and shelves in the right place.

We think the landing may be the place at the Wood where the children lounge around, though toy cars at the top of the stairs may be a problem with certain age groups.

But we are also wondering, only slightly unrealistically, about getting one of those shepherds' huts on wheels, to park in some distant location (if we can get it there).

Janet said...

Yes, Yes to shepherd's hut. I haven't been able to work out how to get one into our back garden without a crane.

Cecilia said...

Drag it down the side lane, surely?

Janet said...

How to get it over the garage?

Cecilia said...

Demolish the garage.

Janet said...

Rather drastic, and the people who own the owns it's attached to might object (tho' they probably wouldn't know for months - one's a housing association, and the other lives somewhere in Worcester and we only see him about once a year)